• Retrospecta, the Yale School
    of Architecture's annual review
    of its student design, published
    in its 2003/04 issue an exchange
    that took place that year between Columbia architectural historian Kenneth Frampton and architect/
    theorist Demetri Porphyrios.
    Both had been guests of Yale — Porphyrious as a visiting professor, Frampton as a guest juror of the
    work of Porphyrios's students. In
    this excerpt from a conversation
    that developed in the course of a student jury, Frampton was talking about architecture. He might as well have been talking about the culture
    in general:

    Kenneth Frampton There is an aphorism by Adolf Loos that goes as follows: “There's no point in inventing anything unless it's an improvement.” It’s an ironic remark, but also a challenge to this moment in time, where everyone seems to be losing it.

    Commerce will tell you that this is ridiculous from the point of view
    of architecture. Now you can say,
    "Well I don't give a damn about
    commerce, this is an artistic work!"
    But Architecture is not...Fine Art in that sense. [Architecture] is a modus, which has to deal with certain kinds
    of reality. Its poetic comes through
    its transformation of reality....

    The question is, What are the limits in which this transformation can take place? You have to talk to society in some way — in a way in which you can appeal to some kind of evident values. It can be money values, but also can, at the same time, can it be other values?

    Otherwise it's like a conversation between the deaf and the dumb! There's no reason why we're to do anything! I could tell you to cut six more slots into this thing, and it wouldn't make a difference. It's a negative critique of the project, but
    it's also a critique of the whole
    goddamn situation.

    You have to have a principle; otherwise you cannot communicate anything to anybody. Why should I invest my money in this, as opposed to some other project? You have to have a reason! Otherwise the architects don't even talk to the society! Don't you see that predicament?

    These computer renderings
    produce aesthetic affects very well, seamless, very seductive, but they
    are not about anything. They are delusions! They are mirages! I'm sorry, it's very aggressive to say this, but aren't we going to start talking? It's just ridiculous to say, "OK — individual interpretations," so on
    and so forth. One has to talk about something fundamental; otherwise we're never going to talk about anything anymore!

    Demitri Porphyrios I'm not sure what you're talking about.

    KF I'm talking about the fact that there is a total degeneration in the capacity to discuss anything.

    DP Do you want some coffee?

    KF No, I don't. Sorry, I don't...

    DP Look, look, look. This is a disgusting situation. It's not right
    to get upset.

    KF It's something to get upset about! We always have polite discussions; we have to sometimes get upset, because otherwise we just don't talk about the things that matter.

Save Gabe's

  • A grassroots initiative to redevelop and restore Gabe's Tower (1963) as an economically and culturally vibrant symbol and icon of Owensboro, Ky.

    Learn more here.



  • Looking at Three for the World,
    Eli Attia's 2002/3 design for the World Trade Center site (pdf below), the towers themselves might not be your cup of tea.

    But the big architectural idea
    that Attia offered with his design — which could have been adapted to a variety of aesthetics — was far superior to anything that rebuilding officials offered to the public or, for that matter, even considered.

    Download a PDF of the design here.

Main | The Kinks, the Cotswolds and the Next World Trade Center »

20 November 2006


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Taming of Nicolai:

My Photo




  • horizonr is created and best
    viewed on Mozilla Firefox.

    RSS feed

    Powered by TypePad

    Copyright © 2006/12 by John Lumea